Skip to main content
Koperateur glossary

Precise terms for decisions that hold up

We use these terms to describe observable capabilities, choices and limits. Choose a path: each definition begins with a real situation and states what it commits us to.

02 · Operational definitions

Decide

Make an explicit choice proportionate to value, risk, effort and actual capability.

01 / 03

Trade-off

Definition
An explicit choice between requirements or options based on their net benefit to the stakeholders concerned.
Nuance
A trade-off recognises that no option maximises everything; it makes gains, sacrifices and revisable assumptions visible.
Concrete situation
Build, buy or retain the existing system after comparing timing, control, total cost and reversibility.
Avoid
Presenting a choice as a purely technical necessity; hiding an option’s downside.
02 / 03

Fit for purpose

Definition
The fit between an answer and the purpose, context, criticality and actual capability it must serve.
Nuance
Fitness for purpose is neither perfection nor maximum technology; it is always bounded by a defined use.
Concrete situation
Keeping human approval for a rare, sensitive decision is a better fit than full automation that is hard to take over.
Avoid
“Perfect”, “best” or “infallible” without a purpose or criterion; “justness” as the translation.
03 / 03

Accountability

Definition
Identification of the person or role that decides, approves, acts and answers for the resulting effects.
Nuance
Participation does not mean owning the trade-off; a tool or model cannot carry human accountability.
Concrete situation
A model proposes, an operator reviews and an identified accountable person authorises the sensitive action.
Avoid
“Collective responsibility” with no identifiable decision owner; “the AI is responsible”.
Put the terms to work

A term matters only when it clarifies action

If your situation does not fit a ready-made definition, that is precisely where scoping begins.